Click image to enlarge Richmond is about to fall to the Yankees...
Show image list »
Richmond is about to fall to the Yankees... - Image 1
Richmond is about to fall to the Yankees... - Image 2
Richmond is about to fall to the Yankees... - Image 3
Richmond is about to fall to the Yankees... - Image 4
Richmond is about to fall to the Yankees... - Image 5
Richmond is about to fall to the Yankees... - Image 6
Richmond is about to fall to the Yankees... - Image 7

Richmond is about to fall to the Yankees...

Item # 726571
June 30, 1862
LOS ANGELES TIMES, June 5, 1981 

* HIV/AIDS is 1st reported to the public 
* Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome
* Over a year prior to it's official name 
* Gay-Related Immune Deficiency

The bottom of page 3 has a heading that reads: "Outbreaks of Pneumonia Among Gay Males Studied" (see images) Through research, this particular report in this publication is the very first time this virus which would later be named "AIDS" was reported to the public. A extremely historic report here.
I suspect this issue to be an extremely rare item because there was really no reason to save it at the time.
Complete 1st section only with all 28 pages, nice condition.

Background: The June 5, 1981, edition of the Los Angeles Times stands as a haunting artifact of epidemiological history, marking the precise moment the HIV/AIDS epidemic transitioned from an observed clinical anomaly to a matter of public record. The report, penned by staff writer Marlene Cimons, detailed the findings of UCLA immunologist Dr. Michael Gottlieb, who had identified five previously healthy young gay men in Los Angeles suffering from Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia—a fungal infection typically seen only in patients with severely compromised immune systems. Because this publication coincided with the CDC’s first official Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) on the subject, it represents the first time the general public was alerted to the mysterious "immune deficiency" that would eventually be named AIDS in 1982. At the time, the virus remained unidentified, and the article’s clinical, somewhat detached tone underscores the era's total lack of awareness regarding the impending global crisis that would eventually claim tens of millions of lives.